From what we can tell, the monitor in question utilizes the M320DAN02.0 matrix. Overall the sRGB color gamut is spotless, and even 97% of DCI-P3 is achieved. That said at default the monitor can use a bit more on the brightness setting, we'd advise 70%. Also, when playing HDR games the monitor did nothing, once we looked into the OSD setting, we noticed HDR was turned off, simply set it at auto and in  games like Alan Wake 2 when enabling HDR, you'll notice the difference you're looking for. Some discrepancies are noticeable, with a bit of clouding at the edges.  The monitor's advertised HDR 400 capability, effectively provides just a bit of tangible enhancement in visual quality. The onboard software interface (OSD) is simplistic, potentially leading to user confusion regarding the status of features like Adaptive Sync, which may display inconsistently. In terms of performance, the monitor excels in reducing ghosting and maintaining a slick display at 240 Hz. Color accuracy out of the box was just over a Delta 1 average, that's really good. Out-of-the-box, the monitor delivers satisfactory but somewhat dim image quality, give it a bit more brightness. It faces only very minor challenges with gamma and color uniformity that restrict its performance from being elevated from good to superior.  Advantages of this monitor include a large workspace due to the monitor's expansive size; the capability for increased brightness settings; an extensive color gamut; a robust and stable stand. However, this size really needs Ultra HD as resolution, some backlight bleeding and uneven white display at the monitor's edges; a glow effect noticeable at the borders due to the angle of view; suboptimal color calibration despite the extensive color range. Upon initial usage, the monitor exhibited no defective pixels. The response time of this monitor is reported to be 1 millisecond, which aligns with more costly monitors possessing similar specifications, including those featuring OLED technology.  In conclusion, this monitor emerges as a decent contender in its price bracket, showing no significant enough shortcomings in either build or performance quality. Its ability to match the response times and display characteristics of higher-priced alternatives suggests that it offers considerable value. Pricing seems to sit around ~325 USD/EUR. We'd recommend it to those who are not bothered by the pixel density at a resolution of 2560x1440 at 32", with a fairly high hertz (240), matrix type (IPS) and very good color reproduction we can certainly recommend this monitor if you can find it cheap enough ...