Radeon RX 7600 XT 16GB - XFX QICK 309 review
Click here to post a comment for Radeon RX 7600 XT 16GB - XFX QICK 309 review on our message forum

moo100times
Am I...am I first? Thanks for the review boss.
For $300 territory it's not bad performing though continues to look not great against the 6700xt

Horus-Anhur
Considering that the base 7600 only has 8GB, having an option with 16GB is a better option.
So this release ends up being an improvement.

Undying
I would also rather have 16gb. Still looks weak in comparison to 6700xt at the same price.
@Hilbert Hagedoorn card is not included in Far Cry 6 1080p results or i cant see it 🙂

Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator

schmidtbag

Horus-Anhur

Rubalvar
The 7600XT 16GB is surprisingly ahead of its 8GB sibling in some games, despite their similar specs.

vestibule
Well?
Imo its a piss poor product!
TY for the review HH. 🙂
The results do have good comic value and I did titter and smile and laugh here and there.

nizzen
"AMD never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity."
Nice job AMD 😛

Undying
It would be better if it came the same msrp as 7600 8gb and that card had oficial price drop. Still, this reminds me of RX580 4gb and RX580 8gb. Not particularly powerful but having more vram really made a difference few years down the road. This time it will be the same.

TLD LARS
When comparing the boards 4060 vs 7600XT, the 7600XT looks to have twice the cost compared to the very barren board of the 4060, so sadly there may not be room for AMD to undercut or match the 4060 prices.

Marti77
Conclusion with RX7600 16Gb is buy RX6700XT instead.

Rubalvar

Airbud

Marti77
Its no use with 16Gb ram if gpu perfomance is poor.

nizzen

TLD LARS

Undying
In Daniel Owen review he made a scene In Racket & Clank where 4060ti 16gb almost being as fast 4070 12gb with RT at 1440p. That said its unrealistic scenario as both cards had low fps without upscaling.

nizzen

alanm